That incredibly cool moment right before everything fell apart
Helmut Lang’s legacy
I recently spent two long afternoons at the Museum of Applied Arts in Vienna. The reason was the exhibition HELMUT LANG. SÉANCE DE TRAVAIL 1986–2005 / Excerpts from the MAK Helmut Lang Archive. It was the first comprehensive exhibition about the Austrian fashion designer and artist born in 1956.
I wanted to find out why the brand founded by Lang in 1986 and left by him in 2005 had such a defining impact, why the fascination with Lang’s work persists to this day, and what his philosophy and process can teach us in a completely changed cultural context.
The man, whose personality was so central to his brand that it immediately faded into irrelevance after his departure, had agreed to the exhibition project, but didn’t show up for the opening. Lang had always been a master at navigating the laws of the attention economy, keeping a low profile and, in doing so, becoming a blank canvas for people’s projections. Anyone who wants to understand the person and his work should therefore hold back on interpretations and stay close to the source material. Only then does the mindset behind his work become clear—and only at this level of abstraction can it remain relevant.
I. The place
As is well known, Lang continues to reside in the United States after moving his home base from Paris to New York in 1998/99. Nevertheless, it was only logical to host the exhibition in Vienna, the city where his career began.
Austria is omnipresent in Lang’s work. By his own account, growing up in the mountains of Styria left him with three things: “the lesson of the earth,” a sense of craftsmanship (his grandfather, who raised him, was a shoemaker), and the confidence to do something with his freedom, as he was sent outside to play as a child in a household without a television. At the same time, Vienna—the city where he first struggled to get by working as a bartender—has left its imprint on his work: not only through the modern rigor and urban civility of Adolf Loos, but also through fin de siècle eroticism, a slightly deranged beauty, elements of Wurschtigkeit (a particular ‘could n’t-care-less’ attitude), and a penchant for the morbid.
You can clearly see the blend of traditional and modern influences in the videos and music from Lang’s fashion shows: Elements of traditional dress (Trachten) are just as prominent as the slim-cut suits that define his aesthetic. Lang set his debut Fall/Winter 86/87 show, “L’apocalypse joyeuse,” to the Third Man Theme from the eponymous film, whereas subsequent runway shows featured electronic tracks by Peter Kruder.
It is for good reason, then, that the curators follow Lang’s maxim of treating all materials with equal importance: documents from the design process, sketches, prototypes, and samples are displayed alongside packaging, advertising proofs, finished campaigns, press clippings, photographs, show videos, behind-the-scenes images, and artist collaborations. By adopting Lang’s design strategy and following the architecture of his shows and shops, the exhibition allows visitors to walk through Lang’s world, experiencing an immersion that goes deeper than a mere display of clothing ever could. Furthermore, those who have long followed Lang’s work—such as yours truly—could easily have been lenders themselves, creating a seamless link between the museum and their personal lives.
II. The era
The exhibition gains an existential depth not only from the objects in the display cases but also from those visitors find in their private wardrobes and archives. Furthermore, it’s the memories that the exhibition evokes of the 1990s. Freddie deBoer aptly described the vibe of that decade as “a modern sensibility without all of the pathologies of the internet.”
„There was an immediacy to experience back then.“ „You used to do things and have places to do them.“
It is ironic that Lang, the very first designer to broadcast a runway show online (one of the many firsts he’s known for), can only be fully appreciated in the very ‘analogousness’ of the historical moment when his career reached its peak. It was the final window of time before the raw edges of major Western cities were gentrified away, before culturalization went into hyperdrive, and before software ate the world. In short, it was that incredibly cool moment right before it all fell apart.
Many of the now 70-year-old designer’s contemporaries and companions have already passed away, including his longtime stylist Melanie Ward. For those who are still alive, the exhibition provides plenty of reasons to look back: to the boutique opened in 1996 at Seilergasse 6, for example, just a stone’s throw from the Loos Bar in the Kärntner Durchgang, or to the iconic shop at 80 Greene Street in New York, which served as the blueprint for the exhibition architecture. Plus, of course, to the breathtakingly confident beauty of those who wore his designs, often so subtly that the Lang label went unrecognized.
Crucial to Lang’s achievements was the lucid grasp of his own age and the openings it afforded him. He leveraged those moments of transition to create a vibrant equilibrium between the analog and digital worlds, tradition and the modern era, and high and popular culture.
III. Mindset and creative process
Anyone looking for a historical comparison in fashion will—despite the completely different silhouettes and their underlying body philosophies—most likely think of the Japanese designer Yohji Yamamoto. Because both are similar not only in their proximity to art, but also in the fact that they aren’t concerned with a particular style, but rather with the code of clothing itself. “I kept all the traditions and shades that were good – and then re-thought it all,” Lang once said, and despite the almost entirely opposite results, this approach mirrors the work of the Japanese artist. In both cases, the designer essentially taps into the source code of tradition to transform it from within, recontextualize it, and make it relevant for today.
Form and Freedom
„We merged the old idea of made-to-measure tradition with punk. That, in essence, is Helmut Lang.“
Lang’s self-assessment captures the essence of his work far more accurately than the minimalist label frequently attached to him. It was the clarity and precision of his basic cuts, refined through constant iteration, that allowed him to focus on materials, details, and creative experimentation.
While frequently labeled as intellectual, Lang’s work is better defined by a distinct blend of mind and sensuality, a form of physicalized wisdom that celebrates the inherent beauty of intelligence. Reduction, certainly, but also an integrated self-reflection (Lang often highlights the constructed nature of the artifacts) and a shifting refraction: “fusing precise tailoring with delicate materials, transparency, and layering,” as one wall text aptly noted. „There was a real structure, but then there also was this real loucheness,“ as fashion critic Tim Blanks noted.1
It only becomes truly apparent in retrospect that Lang’s work represented a human objection to purity ideals of all kinds. An offhand comment made on Japanese television in 1992—”by respecting the tradition, of course”—perfectly encapsulates his position. Embracing formlessness was something he never would have imagined. Nor would he have thought to enforce strict gender boundaries or, conversely, to dissolve them entirely. Lang was interested in the interplay between essence and letting go, materiality and shape, typology and contextual variation, concealing and revealing. He was unwavering yet open to serendipity, respectful while remaining subversive.
This is especially clear in his accessoires vêtements, which are given plenty of room in the exhibition. Just as layering and seemingly non-functional elements add a sense of playfulness to the rigid silhouettes, these objects—shifting between garment and accessory—aren’t mere gimmicks. Instead, they are details that loosen up the seriousness by adding ambiguity, humor, and sex appeal.
Creative adaptation, not absorption
The relationship between the world and a product can be examined from two angles: the path the world takes into products (for instance, through artistic ideas), and the product’s trajectory back into the world.
Through collaborations with artists like Jenny Holzer and by adopting existing forms (such as American utility clothing or fetish wear), Lang “appropriated” the world with his artifacts. But unlike the mere instrumentalizing absorption that has become so typical of the late-modern “creative” economy (the Dylan song underscoring a commercial; the language model turning individual expression into digital blur without regard for copyright), he has added something of his own—in his case, often even something unmistakably personal—through the transformation of the original elements.
His goods, as unlikely as it may sound, embody human imperfection rather than commercial gloss and corporate slickness. Critics like Ingeborg Harms have noted the “provocative balance of urban agility and melancholic disintegration” of Lang’s garments, their “beautiful, lively messiness,” their “wounded, experienced” quality that speaks of the lived lives of grown-ups.2 “They took classic elements,” Vanessa Friedman wrote, “and added just the slyest layer of kink, sending everyone slightly off axis.”
The Lang world’s fractured nature—at times poetic, at others harsh—is also revealed by the people he sent down the runway: intriguing personalities, often recruited from his own circle of friends. Likewise, the backstage photos (another first) bear witness to improvisation and fragility, while also capturing the master’s steady hand.
Lang drew on the ideas circulating around him, yet he refrained from draining their cultural vitality just to repackage them as hollow commodities. Quite the opposite, Lang offered something in return, enriching things with his soul.
Intervention, not image
Lang frequently pointed out that his clothes are crafted for “real life,” not for the camera or the catwalk. He drew inspiration from workwear and utility clothing, as well as denim and T-shirts. “His most expensive formal clothes have the ease and simplicity of everyday stuff, and his casual clothes have the correctness and detailing of ready-to-wear,” wrote John Seabrook in the New Yorker. A key strength of the Vienna exhibition is its highlighting of the reach of Lang’s concepts beyond the actual garments:
We’re retracing how Helmut Lang designed the runway at floor level, so that the models were no longer stared at on a pedestal, but could instead walk back and forth right through the rows of the audience. We’re reminded that Lang was the first to send famous models and old friends (among them Elfie Semotan), men and women, young and old, and people of diverse skin colors down the runway all at once. We’re looking at the 1998 taxi top campaign, where Lang ran ads on over 1,000 New York City taxi tops, as well as in National Geographic – places far outside the fashion bubble. His stores weren’t just displays, but rather places you actually moved through. We learn that he discontinued his secondary line in 2000 because he no longer wanted a hierarchy between evening wear and everyday clothing. Lang converted paper bags into clutches and formulated a fragrance reminiscent of the worn garments of a loved one who is no longer present. In short, he delivered on the avant-garde pledge to transition art into the realm of life through site-specific installations, urban interventions, and shifts in everyday life.
IV. What remains?
As confident as it was to step down at the height of his success, and as much as Lang’s new pursuit as an artist makes biographical sense—just as a full life requires withdrawal and reflection—Lang’s radical break caught his followers off guard, forcing them to wear his now-unavailable pieces for decades until they fell apart, exactly as was intended.
What more does Lang’s retirement represent, though? Is it no longer possible to work the way he did today? Has the paradigm worn thin, as culture now oscillates between a mix of imposed and self-imposed calculatedness on the one hand and blatant tribal signaling on the other? „When everything you experience arrives predigested, nothing feels like it’s yours, and everything feels rushed,“ Freddie deBoer writes about the post-1990s era. Is there still room for the quiet resolve—the calm, almost shy radicalism—that the soft-spoken designer embodied in such an unprecedented way, the impact of which still echoes today?
Maybe what makes Lang’s legacy so alluring today is that it carries a certain hangover vibe, a sense of the morning after. Lang designed fashion for adults who still have that rebellious spark but also don’t kid themselves. Identity-driven slogans don’t win them over any more than mere private prosperity does. Therefore, abandoning the avant-garde gesture of art crossing over into the fabric of everyday life is not an option.
One can look to see whether enough friction remains in other parts of the world to still strike a spark. One might seek out cultural energy in other realms, such as the culinary world. And one can acknowledge just “how idiosyncratic — how personal — the exhibition is. It all comes from him,” as Tim Blanks observed.
As previously noted, Lang wasn’t concerned with a specific style but with the effects flowing from deep conceptual rigor. His garments felt so natural back then and remain so desirable today because they empowered people to be their best selves.
Elfie Semotan:
„People weren’t walking around in disguises or anything; they just looked much sharper.“
Neville Wakefield:
„It’s like everything with him: It fits. And I don’t mean physically. It fits psychologically. You feel yourself in his designs.“
Vanessa Friedman:
„It made me feel like both the coolest and the most grown-up versions of myself.“
Tim Blanks:
„His clothes were extremely intelligent and they were functional. But once you got into them, they were also sexual.“
Sarah Mower3
„The designers who succeed are those who hit on something that makes us feel more ourselves. Stronger; cooler; more confident, certainly. But ultimately, ourselves.“
This widely recognized effect—of not looking like an idiot wearing someone else’s ideas—the designer’s frankness in not dictating anything to you, but rather helping you be the best version of yourself, contains a radical message of freedom. It might hold Helmut Lang’s most important legacy.
In: 032c 31st Issue Winter 2016/17, p. 76
Ingeborg Harms: “You can’t copy soul“: The Helmut Lang Legacy, in: l.c., p. 38-48
In: Arena Homme + S/S 2002, p. 271